Originally Posted by CypherEnigma
An addition to this I want to see detailed description of methodologies. Coals, tobacco, foil/not. There are too many factors to simply take a study at a distance. I want to see details that can duplicate the CO levels described.
Couldn't agree more. I'm tired of countless studies being published where they didn't reveal their methodology. As they say, there's lies, damned lies, and statistics. That doesn't fully apply here but I think you get my gist seeing as how a study comes out and the crowd suddenly thinks it's fact.
"Like lambs to the slaughter."